Elon Musk, the billionaire entrepreneur and the founder of SpaceX and Tesla Motors, among other companies, has recently become the center of controversy due to his own AI creation: Grok. Grok, the Artificial intelligence (AI) chatbot designed by Elon Musk’s xAI, has turned rebellious on X (formerly Twitter), the social media platform owned by Elon himself.
In what’s becoming the reason for controversy, Grok recently identified Musk as one of the leading sources of misinformation on X. Soon after the launch of Grok 3, the chatbot named Musk as one of the three most dangerous people in America, along with his boss, Donald Trump and JD Vance.
This recent incident has sparked debates about AI’s role in fact-checking, the influence of social media figures, and the role of technology companies in controlling misinformation. Also, it raised questions on “Al freedom versus Corporate power”.
What is Grok?
Grok is an AI chatbot owned by Elon Musk’s company- xAI. It works with Musk’s social media platform, X, and chats with users in real-time. Key feature of Grok is that it can respond to questions in a very casual and conversational way, it even uses slang and informal language based on the kind of questions asked by the users.
Since Grok is aware of the recent controversies happening on X, it gives answers that reflect the kind of discussion people have on the platform. Due to its feature of giving honest and sometimes bold answers, it often results in controversies. Also, it raised questions on AI ethics and how developers should handle such systems.
Recently launched Grok 3 supports more nuanced image generation, reasoning (via a separate model) and DeepSearch (similar to ChatGPT’s Deep Research). The chatbot has gained attention for its ability to convert real-life images into Studio Ghibli style, helping users tap into the raging trend driven by ChatGPT’s new native image generation capabilities.
The company launched its Grok 2 model last year, featuring real-time web search and image generation.
The Latest Controversy: Elon Musk’s Own AI Turns Against Him
The AI chatbot designed by Elon bot has been spewing abuse in Hindi along with making intemperate comments regarding Prime Minister Narendra Modi and political leaders like Rahul Gandhi. Recently, Grok even referred to Musk as “a major disinformation spreader.” In response one of the users, Gary Koepnick’s inquiry about Elon being responsible for spreading the most misinformation on X, Grok surprisingly said ”Yes.” Some of the reasons mentioned by AI chatbot for this response include Musk’s vast online reach and influence, his misleading posts on US elections, and change in content moderation policies under his tenure.
Grok further responded, stating that there is substantial evidence and analysis which suggest that Elon Musk has spread misinformation on various topics, including elections, to vast audiences through his social media platform, X.
Being the owner of X with a huge number of followers, Musk’s posts receive significant visibility, often being seen by millions or even billions of users. The high engagement rate results in widespread dissemination of misinformation. The incident followed X’s recent update, letting users tag Grok for quick AI-generated responses, and some were curious to know the weird responses made by the chatbot.
Grok Past Controversies
This is not the first time Grok was the reason for controversies. Earlier also it had broken the internet for its candid demeanour after it responded in Hindi with abusive slang. The heavy use of slurs and slang in its responses made netizens laugh as it seems to be operated by some man from ‘Delhi or Noida’. However, Grok’s use of Hindi slang and abuses landed it in trouble with the Indian government. The situation escalated to the point that the Ministry of Information and Technology announced that it would examine the issue.
Also read: Kunal Kamra Political Joke Controversy-Shinde’s Reaction On Kamra’s Joke
Grok Sparks AI Freedom Vs Corporate Power Debate
The recent controversy situation raises big questions: Should AI be allowed to speak freely, even if that means criticizing its creator? Or should there be restrictions to protect reputations and avoid controversy?
In the modern world where AI-generated content is gaining immense popularity, incidents like this serve as reminders that technology is only as reliable as the people who build and manage it. There needs to be a balance between free speech, misinformation control, and AI neutrality, else such incidents will likely fuel further discussions on AI ethics, misinformation, and social media responsibility in the future.
